Build a Wall Around the Blue States
Wednesday, April 12, 2006 at 09:12PM Steve White, 8th grade science teacher at West Limestone High School in Alabama, doubling as Democratic candidate for District 4 seat on the House of Representatives, thought it would be smart to show his class of 13 year olds this offensive video that refers to Pres. Bush and other prominent Republicans as a**-h***s. Watch the Video (ADVISORY: do not view if you have just eaten or have high blood pressure)
Back on January 20, 2005, US Army recruiter SFC Jeff Due bravely ventured into liberal academia at Seattle Central Community College this recruiter was and was booed and harassed off the campus:
On Tuesday, a military recruiter visited the University of California - Santa Cruz (UCSC) and was also run off by an anti-war student group. The group is labeled a "credible threat" to national security on a Department of Defense database after similarly forcing military representatives to leave a job fair last year, according to the Santa Cruz Sentinel:
(*an education is what they need if this group thinks Iraq is a US occupation)
Here’s a short video of the recruiter leaving the campus. His van was subsequently assaulted by a student throwing a rock. VIDEO
Its time for a social experiment.
Proposition: that the gathering of all liberal, anti-war, anti-military, anti-American, pro-illegal immigrant individuals should be systematically rounded up and placed in the Left half of the country to live together, with all rights currently afforded them. A wall separating the Left from the Right States will be erected. Illegal aliens, gay marriages, abortion on demand, affirmative action, euthanasia and assisted suicide will all be legalized, not criminalized. In these Left States there will be no death penalty, no Presidential surveillance program, no Patriot Act, no military and no religion, They may elect their own President from a pool of the usual suspects, to include Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Al Gore, and may end the electoral college and expand Presidential terms to an unlimited amount. The Left States will have open borders, no right to bear arms, all the right to privacy they can tolerate and the right to burn the flag and/or display it upside down.
After a few years, whose States will be overrun with thugs, poverty, crime, STDs, lawlessness, AIDS and terrorism? Let these ingrates have what they want and get what they deserve. They gave peace a chance, we got 9/11. The "Left States" will become another Sodom and Gomorrah. So be it.
END THE UNJUST OCCUPATION OF RED STATES BY WHINY LIBERALS NOW
Michelle Malkin Expose the Left
Trackback URL:
http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/trackback/440427
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (73)
Mwalimu, thanks for nailing it!
2) What is that big yellow thing in the second picture?
3) These kids have the right to speak.
4) Amy, Your idea about creating a "left" country has already been done, France, Sweden, England, Amsterdam, Belgium, and Canada. And guess what? They are nice places to live. In fact they have FAR less violent crime than we do.
I liked your modest proposal. Humorous though it was, I do wonder if that could eventually become a political necessity here. Clearly the US is made up of two different, irreconciliable ideologies.
Meg, you have GOT to be kidding. None of the countries you named have open borders. None of them can be looked to as a success story. There's a book by Pope Benedict while he was Cardinal Ratzinger called "Crisis of Cultures" about the demise of Europe. No offense, but I take his word for the pathetic state of Europe over yours. He was raised in Nazi Germany. He also co-wrote Without Roots, as I described in my entry called "It's the demography, stupid". I would recommend both books for your reading.
http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/2006/3/24/its-the-demography-stupid.html
Far less violent crime? Have you been watching the riots in France from first Muslims and then French youth? FRANCE WAS EVEN GLORIFIED AT THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION RALLY as the standard. And that's where the democrats are; as blind as the French. The French are a bunch of feminized sissies with a bad economy, a weak military and terrible domestic crisises. Poverty, unemployment, out of wedlock births, rioting, you name it. Canada might be pretty, but it can hardly be called worth emulating. Their border patrol is a bunch of wusses who don't even carry weapons because they're afraid they'll tick off all the criminals entering illegally. I'm not kidding. They have a serious crime issue, especially with the importing of drugs.
Democrats emulate Canada and France: rebellion, glorification of military deserters, weak and spineless men, low birth rates and religious life...
The United States is the greatest country on the face of the earth DESPITE Democrats and because there are still god-fearing, law abiding citizens who even dare to go to Church, where they learn about love and service. Ye gads, what a concept!
There is nothing funny about the video. It's a disgustingly accurate representation of liberals. They're gutter mouthed slobs who take advantage of the things the President has done for their country, take advantage of what the military has done for their country, and then have the stupid audacity to criticize it, revealing the idiots that they truly are. I would LOVE to see them live in a country that they want.... they'd die out in a couple generations. They'd be overrun by "legal immigrants", the crime rate would be outrageous because of their weak stance on crime, they'd be having less and less babies because of their 1) pro-abortion agenda, 2) pro-gay marriage agenda and 3) all around self-centered, self-serving lifestyles. They'd be attacked by terrorists but, yippie, at least no one would be spying on al-Qaeda! They are the reason we're hated by al-Qaeda.
Maybe I am just around too many liberals. I'm dumbfounded still by the illegal immigrants rally and the peaceniks we counter protest... their stupidity and lawlessness is unbelievable. I'm fed up and have no patience with them, particularly after seeing their disgust of the military. These unimaginable ingrates have the life they have because the military protects their sorry asses and they're too self-absorbed to take their heads out of their butts to notice.
Whatever befalls them, they deserve.
Not all liberals want completely open boarders. My point is that there are countries out there that are far to the left of America, and guess what? They are nice places to live. Have you ever been to any of them? They are a lot like here, only with thinner people and more art. (Although I do agree that liberals need to start having more babies!)
Your example about the riots in France do not prove that there is more violent crime there than here. Do you know how statistics work? How many murders do we have here compared with Europe?
http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/murder.html#world
And while you arte looking at these statistics, notice which cities are the safest….BLUE ONES! : )
P.S.
Pope Benedict not only was raised in Nazi Germany. He was in their army.
"These unimaginable ingrates have the life they have because the military protects their sorry asses and they're too self-absorbed to take their heads out of their butts to notice."
You said it sister!!
Surely you jest.
The birth rates in Europe have plunged below 1.5 per couple. This means that their civilization is in free fall decline. Guess who's stepping in to make up the slack? Our Islamic friends from the middle east, Africa and Asia. In one generation, Europe will be an Islamic ruled - continent without having to fire a shot. So there's where your brave-new-world secularist society leads.
Amy is exactly right; what Al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists hate most about the US is the exportation of liberal culture (not government as is falsely believed) such as Madonna, Hollywood, pornography, abortion culture, artificial contraceptives, feminism, etc... If don't believe that then you are in the dark, dearest.
I totally agree with you. But what does that have to do with republican's being able to make a much better society than democrats would make? You can't ignore the facts that some liberal societies have done very well as far as crime and social programs go (not only abroad, but right here in this country!).
And you can't ignore the facts that the conservative parts of this country have higer rates of violence, teen pregnancy, divorce, and people who are under-educated.
Tim,
So What? The Liberals still kicked the Conservatives’s behinds.
Marjike, glad to hear that I am not the only puzzled about the "Americanism" of today. Somehow I think that they are bombarded with polarizing views of life and as a result have molded to think this way. For outsiders like ourselves, it seems like an obvious recipe for disaster, but all we can do is sit and watch.
Cheers
1. The liberal countries you mentioned butchered each other to pieces in two world wars with millions of casualties until the United States military intervened and saved the continent twice. Our military presence in Europe since 1944 has excused the Europeans from having to spend on defense or serve in their own militaries which has resulted in the European affluence you cite. Who picked up the tab for a peaceful Europe? American taxpayers. Who rebuilt much of post-war Europe? Ever heard of the Marshall Plan? That free ride will come to and end soon and we'll see how peaceful and tidy European society will be with a massive Muslim population challenging their statist, secularist policies.
2. Yes I can dispute your 'facts'. Murder is only one metric for measuring lawlessness. I wonder what states have the highest incidence of child pornography? Gang violence? Drug trafficking?
3. It is very wrong to categorize the Union as 'liberals' and the Confederacy as 'conservatives'. Secession from the union was NOT a conservative value. The demographics were much more complex than that. And as far as 'kicking behinds', the South extracted a much higher price from the North in combat casualties, received less pay, had fewer troops and equipment, almost no industry to speak of, and continued to volunteer until the final days of the conflict. In the North (how's this for liberal?) you could pay people to take your place in the conscription to duty. While slavery is an objective evil and bad for the USA, you are grievously in error to describe the final victory of the union as a 'kicking [of confederate] behind[s]' - the statistics just do not support that.
Tim, great point about GOP President Lincoln.
You and your obsession with this "falling birthrate" theory. I can't count the number of times you've tried to make broad statements about the complexities of society based on falling birthrates! Funny though.
http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/2006/3/24/its-the-demography-stupid.html
Your connotation about Pope Benedict is insulting. Who knows Europe better than he, not that you'd listen because it differs from your arm-chair quarterbacking perspective.
He was forced to join the Hitler Youth. it was the law, but he refused to participate. Then he was DRAFTED into the German Army. Your implications are not only ignorant, but disappointing:
"Following his fourteenth birthday in 1941, Ratzinger joined the Hitler Youth, membership of which was legally required from December 1936.According to one of Ratzinger's biographers, the National Catholic Reporter correspondent John Allen, he was an unenthusiastic member who refused to attend meetings.
In 1943, when he was 16, Ratzinger was drafted with many of his classmates into the Luftwaffenhelfer programme. After his class was released from the Corps in September 1944, Ratzinger was put to work setting up anti-tank defences in the Hungarian border area of Austria in preparation for the expected Red Army offensive. He was eventually drafted into the German army at Munich to receive basic infantry training in the nearby town of Traunstein. His unit served at various posts around the city and was never sent to the front. Ratzinger was briefly interned in an Allied prisoner-of-war camp near Ulm and was repatriated on June 19, 1945. The family was reunited when his brother, Georg, returned after being repatriated from a prisoner-of-war camp in Italy."
It's true! The Republicans used to be liberals and the Democrats used to be conservatives.
http://uncpress.unc.edu/chapters/frederickson_dixiecrat.html
Seriously, you have a LOT of nerve saying my facts are off, when you don't know simple things like this.
CRIME
Crime is generally lower in the Liberal states. But make sure to look at the percentage data and not the totals, since more people live in liberal states.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004912.html
DIVORCE
Conservative states have higher rates of divorce:
http://www.divorcereform.org/94staterates.html
ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY
The highest state adolescent pregnancy rates are Nevada, Arizona, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. The lowest state adolescent Pregnancy rates are North Dakota, Vermont, New Hampshire, Minnesota and Maine.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/state_pregnancy_trends.pdf
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Look at which states have the highest rates of domestic violence:
http://www.silentwitness.net/states/us_map.htm
I couldn’t find any state comparisons on child pornography, but just in case you think a republican would never do anything like that:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/04/04/homeland.arrest/
Now can you guys admit that if liberals were that “stupid,” they wouldn’t be able to run societies that out-do conservative ones on all these issues?
P.S.
Except birth rates, I know, I know, and I agree with you!
"The liberal countries you mentioned butchered each other to pieces in two world wars with millions of casualties until the United States military intervened and saved the continent twice. Our military presence in Europe since 1944 has excused the Europeans from having to spend on defense or serve in their own militaries which has resulted in the European affluence you cite. Who picked up the tab for a peaceful Europe? American taxpayers. Who rebuilt much of post-war Europe? Ever heard of the Marshall Plan? That free ride will come to and end soon and we'll see how peaceful and tidy European society will be with a massive Muslim population challenging their statist, secularist policies."
WW1 was certainly not caused by liberalism.
The "free ride" theory is a bit simplistic. For example, the enormous brunt of the cost of WW1 fell on British shoulders. Also, it assumes that the stability of Europe was not in America's interests; it most certainly was. But, a wise and generous plan it certainly was. It's a pity Europe rejected Wilson's plans in 1918.
"2. Yes I can dispute your 'facts'. Murder is only one metric for measuring lawlessness. I wonder what states have the highest incidence of child pornography? Gang violence? Drug trafficking?"
Gang violence is almost impossible in rural states, it needs a city. Drug trafficking? I bet there's plenty of good ol' boys growing their own in red states. Unmeasurable, sadly.
Violent murder capitol of the US is Handgunfree Washington, DC. Check YOUR stats again.
Let's see you walk the streets of Compton or Watts at night and we'll compare those crime stats, if you survive.
Amy is correct on the German army. 20/20 back-vision is a luxury.
I agree with you that society is much "better" in Europe. People respect each other's property, have 10 o'clock quiet times, the streets are quiet, schools are disciplined. This is because about 95% of the people who live there are married. Another fact is that when you wish to live in a town, you must register with the police department and show your ID and they do a background check. After about 5 years, you may apply for residency. No illegal alliens allowed. Visitors, yes, but you can not work there without extensive paperwork. Where have you lived or visited there?
Then came the 60s: Drugs, no God in the classroom and the victim status. Instant no-dues-need-to-be-paid, everyone is equal junk.
I would go with murder over what you listed, but pick some metrics, then we can compare and contrast. If the discussion is on liberal=communism, then there is no discussion. Communism is evil. liberal-socialists, the elite using slaves to prop them up is morally bankrupt. We had a free society here in the USA so that each person could choose their own path. Education was to be the equalizer. Now the NEA style of education amounts to demoralizing, dumbing down our children. Public school are a breeding ground for:
Drugs, child pornography, pre-marital sex, gangs and murder. Home schooling, independent, Church or private schools are the only way to keep a child free and safe.
Nowhere did I say that liberalism caused WWI. I was responding to Meg's assertion that the continent was so safe and pleasant and at the same time shamelessly liberal. I merely pointed out that the 20th century saw unprecedented violence on a massive scale in Europe (and all over the world) while it was Uncle Sam who saved the continent twice (the Brits deserve all the credit in the world!) and the beneficiaries are the Europeans. Meg is out on a limb with the liberal-Europe is safer than the US - the fact is, liberal Europe is ONLY safe because the USA saved their collective bacon from each other TWICE and protected them from each other and the Soviets for 50 years.
Thank God for flat-earth, Bible belt GI Joes who have to keep saving all these modern, liberal scientific visionaries from each other.
I know lots of liberals that joined the military. My husband didn't enlist, but he was a prosecutor in the JAG Core, and if you think I'm liberal you should see him!
The fact is, liberal societies do some (notice I said some not all) things MUCH better than conservatives ones do, and that's true even right here in the US.
Everyone who has disagreed with me on this point, has given me no p r o o f.
I simply agreed with Amy regarding the significant differences that exist here. As far as a war being fought over it, I don't much care for that (then or now).
It's a non-issue anyway. (1) it'll never happen and (2) I live in Texas, which can legally separate at any time and for any reason.
By the way, that war is called "the War of Northern Aggression" by a lot of people. You do know that, right?
I sure do Trent. I'm from Texas too :)
The book by UNC on one party in 1948 hardly connects a party changing its values. Amy's contention is that a good part of liberal states do not embrace law and order.
For a good comparison of crime per capita, how about:
http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/statab/sec05.pdf
Am I correct in thinking that your contention is that "red states" have more crime per capita than "blue states"? Red states being those who voted for Kerry in 2004 and Blue states being those who voted for Bush.
Crime being murder, robbery, rape. On initial analysis, there seems to be no significant difference, but I will be glad to run the numbers. I did look at your references, but they are mostly individuals, not groups of people. In the one case of pornography, the person was working in Maryland.
Who emboldened the Viet Cong in the 1970s? Liberals. Who emboldens Al Qaeda today? Liberals.
I do not support dividing the country in two, but I do believe that liberals are consumers of liberty more than producers of it.
“We have no government armed with the power capable of containing human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made for the governance of a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the governance of anything else.”
-John Adams, 2nd President of the United States
Let's not get into quoting founding fathers, because some of them said some pretty meant things about religion.
Chief,
Yes that is my contention. All the links I provided are groups (but you may have to scroll down to find them), except for the last one about the Republican child molester.
Those statistics you pointed to do seem to suggest that blue states have less violent crime than red states. Amazing but true : )
City statistics can be difficult, because almost all big cities are liberal (If you don’t believe me look at a county presidential election map for 2004. It’s amazing how you can point out where large cities are by where the blue parts are.)
And don't forget higher rates of teen pregnancy, divorce, and domestic violence in red states!
P.S.
Chief, if you don't believe the that the parties "switched" (for desegregation purposes), do some research on it. I swear it's true. Use the artical I linked to for good google search terms. Lincon was a Republican when being a Republican meant you were liberal! I know it sounds like double-speak, but it's true.
Chief, He was living in Maryland, but my point was that he’s a conservative in the Homeland security department.
Okay, now I am in NO WAY saying conservatives are child molesters. They come in all shapes and sizes. My point it that not all conservatives are "good people," who would make a better society than liberals would.
Side Note: Doesn’t it scare you to think that this guy works for our security, but is such a moron that he got caught doing this? I mean he told the little girl who he really was and where he worked!!! Scary.
Hopefully it's true in reverse, there are a lot of liberals here in Houston that might be happier in San Fran.
Some founding fathers said mean things about religion. That's true. Like Jefferson. Who then turned around and used government tax payer dollars to convert Indians to Christianity. Considering the Framers' track records at endorsing religion, quote them all you want, I'm comfortable with that. You know, under the liberal interpretation of the establishment clause, every politician who has ever lived in this country are guilty of violating the Constitution, since every one of them had to swear on the Holy Bible to take office. Not a Christian response, but a clear endorsement of the authority of the Word.
Conservatives build a better society. You have no evidence to the contrary, unless you think it is conservatives responsible for more abortion, more teen pregnancy, (let me guess, we didn't give them birth control and its inconcievable that they wouldn't have sex until they were adults) murder, drug use, etc. Is LA a liberal city or conservative? How about Philadelphia? Detroit? San Francisco? D.C? Boston? Seattle? Chicago? NCY? Pretty sure those are all liberal cities in very blue states with the highest crime rates in the country.
I know, I know!! It is a bananna slug, the mascot of that particular campus.
Tim,
"Conservatives build a better society. You have no evidence to the contrary,"
No Tim. I do have evidence to the contrary. YOU are the one wihtout any. You need to use STATISTICS to back up your arguments. You know, those little things separating fact from your belief.
Maybe it's the 500 million year old worm who pooped his pants in Amy's other post.
Gosh, Tim and what SATISTICS did you use to prove that? Because if you will look at some of the links I posted, you will see that New York is actually one of the safest cities to live in. And like I said earlier, if you had bothered to read my posts and look at my links, you would see that state wise, blue states have: lower crime, teen pregnancy, domestic abuse, and divorce than red states do.
Amy, True, everyone needs a military for protection. Liberals don't want to get rid of the military, we are just mad about the war we are currently fighting. Those students took it out, unfairly, on a recruiter.