Has it hit y'all yet that no one cares about other people's sex lives quite as much as Republicans do? Do you think Bill Clinton's current 65% job approval rating is going to be a liability to Hillary Clinton getting to the White House, or to ANY Democratic candidate for that matter? Who really cares what a dead Gerald Ford has to say about Bill Clinton's sex life?
Oh, yeah, you guys...
The most gullible people on the face of the Earth -- Loyal Bushie Clinton Haters.

I care.

No vote for dems from me.

I don't believe America will vote the Clinton's back into the White House again.

No more Clinton's no more Bush's.......

No more sex freaks, scandles or liars......

And at least "W" doesn't have a personal scandle to his term in office.

Say what you will, that's a fact.

Now, scream and cry and yell about how good the Clinton's are.....
We KNOW it ain't so....

Sad that the Dems don't think a deviant's sex life is anybody's business but their own. But it certainly makes a difference to the electorate. I can give you an example of Bill Clinton's sickness: Once while traveling to Jackson for vacation, Air Force One touched down in Idaho Falls, which was the closest airport capable. At the end of the receiving line was our own lovely Miss Idaho Falls. As Clinton shook hands with other dignitaries down the line, he kept ogling Miss IF, and when he got to her, he grasped her hand, put his other arm around her waist and pulled her into hiis groin. Shocked at what was going on, Miss IF's father, who was standing next to her, pushed Clinton's hands from off his daughter. Immediately the secret service men hustled the father away and instructed him that he was to never touch Clinton under any circumstances. Well, so be it, but the next time Clinton touched down in Idaho Falls on his way to vacation in Jackson, Miss Idaho Falls wasn't in the receiving line to "greet" him. Neither were a lot of other people that were pretty disgusted with what they had seen. So you might say nobody cares about Clinton's sex life, but that would be a lie. You might also consider that very few people want him to ever come through here again; I certainly don't! And so this isn't such a shocker, I'm not a Republican. I'm an Independent. And it's a scathing rebuke to our electorate that Clinton's approval rating is so high, unless maybe there's that many people out there that think sexual deviancy, especially in our elected officials, is A-Ok. How sad!

re: "So you might say nobody cares about Clinton's sex life, but that would be a lie."

Actually, I didn't say nobody cared about Clinton's sex life, so THAT would be a lie.
I said (QUOTE): "Has it hit y'all yet that no one cares about other people's sex lives quite as much as Republicans do?"

What I said about Clinton is that 65% of America approves of the job he did as President. NO screaming or crying over THAT stat from this corner.

And from the looks of these posts, it appears it's down to just TWO of ya who care about other people's sex lives... so, my bad.
Correction: Has it hit y'all that only one Republican and one "Independent" from Iowa cares about other people's sex lives?

If you're taking a vote, then you're outnumbered 2 to 1, so you lose, buckwheat! Anybody arguing FOR Clinton's sexual deviancy looks pretty silly regardless of what venue you're doing it in.

Libs accuse conservatives of being obsessed with sex when they absorb hours of air time with Tom Foley and Larry Craig. Then they say it's "only" sex and continue to obsess over Tom Foley and Larry Craig. What wascally wabbits libs are!

I wonder, is Clinton's sex scandal less newsworthy than, say, Mitt Romney's hair reported by CNN?

The Clinton scandal is humiliating for liberalism and I think it's fun pointing that out. The weakness of liberalism is that it rejects religion and an absolute moral standard making everyone their own god to determine their own commandments.

They ask for this type of attention.

Not just that, if this couple is in the White House again I as an American have every right to be concerned. Those of us with morals are funny like that.

lmao this cracks me up! Doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

"And at least "W" doesn't have a personal scandle to his term in office."

GWB has enough official scandal - the grossly (and perhaps criminally) negligent fiascos in the Middle East, Katrina, etc., etc., etc. I am still amazed that none of GWB's disasters seem to bother one whit all the pompous, prudish, crotchety. voyeuristic re-pube-licans that can't seem to keep their minds off Clinton's penis.

The real Insult to the American people's intelligence is the show Bill and Hillary put on. they pretend all's rosy in their marrage yet seldom spend time together. Everything is a show, little or no sincerity.

Take Bill out of the picture and what is left of Hillary that anybody, even liberals, would vote for? not a damn thing. the far left can't stand her because of her voting record in the senate, and the centrist's can't stand her for her crazy entitlement promises. all the "support" she has now is by Idiots who think they are voting Bill back in.

Mark in Irvine (California, go figure!), you're the one talking about the man's p@#*!, not me. As I said above, libs accuse conservatives of being obsessed with Clinton's sex yet they can't get over Tom Foley and Larry Craig. Hmmm....

What fiascos? The "Middle East fiasco" was created by Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussien, Iran, et al. The Katrina "fiasco" was created first by God, then by the Democratic leadership in Louisianna who were too incompetent to safeguard their own constiituents.

And now an ex-president who speaks highly of Clinton calls him a sex addict and you're mad at us because????

Since the dems have demonstrate over and over they have no problem with Bill’s sex addition, Ford was warning all of us about our future as USA citizens.

I think Ford was warning all of us – if Bill Gets back to the White House, anyway he can, he will step –up the intern sex parties. He may have wild extravagant intern sex parties each night in the White House, and, Hillary as pres. will not be able to concentrate on her job. There will be wild parties, bands, balloons, short-dresses, young females, and Bill -- he may invite the Dem congressmen to come on by and “get the Party started.” This way, the Republicans argue no work could get done. That was Ford’s argument.

I can't decide which comment is more risible: AmyP's or CalPatriot's. Poor delusional AmyP would have us believe that GWB had nothing to do with all the death and destruction in the Middle East (and the embarrassing "performance" of FEMA in and last week re: California) and can't bring herself to use a perfectly legitimate and respectable word when she's the one who raised (ahem) the subject; while CapPatriot is predicting sex parties and balloons in the WH if Hilary wins. Haven't you to got something more important to concern yourselves with? No wonder the Republican party is in such dire straits.

No woman under the age of 80 is safe around Bill Clinton. He's a pervert. Let George Bush -- or any Republican in office -- have a sex scandal and see how much the libs ignore it. They'd be all over that like white on rice, hollering like stuck pigs before he even had his pants zipped up. We would NEVER hear the end of it, and I'm pretty sure all the salient/prurient details would be hashed over until there was nothing left to hash. What hypocrites, and what liars. ALL they care about is sex -- every kind of sex imaginable, the more deviant the better -- and they won't be happy until it's legal to do it on the sidewalk with two-year-olds watching. Oh, wait -- in Nancy Pelosi's bailiwick, apparently that's ALREADY legal! Libs can't tear down the last vestiges of decency fast enough. God help us if we are stupid enough to elect Hillary Clinton to the White House.

Well said, jennyW.

Newsflash to Mark in Irvine: the Middle East was worse off before the invasion of Iraq. And believe it or not, terrorism existed BEFORE March 2003 in the Middle East. In Afghanistan, the Taliban ruled with a terrifying iron fist. Syria occupied Lebanon. Iraq was ruled by Saddam Hussein, one of the world's greatest weapon of mass destruction.
Pro-democracy/freedom marches are on the rise since other people in oppressive countries have seen the unfolding of democracy (or something that resemles it) can look like.

Is achieving peace easy? No. If it were, it would have been achieved already and diplomacy has its limitations when dealing with tyrants.

Its easy to sit back and criticize the goal of world peace, isn't it, particularly when you're in a free country and blood has already paid for YOUR freedom. Who cares about our brothers and sisters in the rest of the world?

I'm confused about the justification for bashing Bush over trying to free people and make American security a priority and condemning others for dialoguing about the front runner in the Dem Party and her first Laddy. Hypocrisy, anyone?

Republican sex scandals out number democratic sex scandals 12 to 1. You guys are obsessed about Clinton's penis activities. You should mind your own sexual business - that is if you have any sexual business to mind.

Ha! Gee, mudkitty, you libs sure like throwing the "p" word around! Talking to Republicans about the Clinton years gives you guys a chance to use the proper term rather than the gutteral term you're all so used to.

I consider it an honor to have elevated your debate.

And I'd love to see some proof about your 12-1 ratio in favor of Republicans, unless you're talking size and not quantity?

And why are libs so dang touchy about Clinton's behavior? He did it, blame him. Morality has a place in public debate, although I know your party would love for that not to be the case.

P-PS.... how come no libs are mad at Gerald Ford? Or Thomas DeFrank, the author of the book? You might need some help for this displaced hostility.

'Blue dress Democrats'
Enough said.

Let's not talk about Bill's privates, he disgraced the WH with his sexual activities there- so- he's a brilliant, but truly flawed human being- and has great political mind--problem is Hillary will be using the same stuff--"Depends what the definition of is is" or something like that...he and she would lie about anything to further her/his cause..she's showing the same "slick Willie" answers to hard questions--she has been elected on his merits not hers, hopefully she's unelectable at the national stage.