Sheryl Crow’s Toilet Paper Manifesto
Monday, April 23, 2007 at 10:34AM Bottom Line Up Front: In another “shut up and sing” moment for the recording industry, singer Sheryl Crow weighs in on ideas to save the earth from pesky human intrusions into Mother Earth’s personal space and stopping global warming. This is not a parody.
Her self-titled ecoblog is chalked full of GREAT ideas, including saving the earth by saving the toilet paper:
I have spent the better part of this tour trying to come up with easy ways for us all to become a part of the solution to global warming. Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. One of my favorites is in the area of conserving trees which we heavily rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many sqares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. When presenting this idea to my younger brother, who’s judgement I trust implicitly, he proposed taking it one step further. I believe his quote was, “how bout just washing the one square out.”
OMG. And she’s serious. I can only assume her blog provider doesn’t have spell check. Obvious observations about hygiene will saved for the comment section!
She goes on excitedly to share another explosion of brilliance as long as no one steals her idea…. AS IF!
This next idea I have been saving but I will share it with you if you promise not to steal it. It is my latest, very exciting idea for creating incentive for us all to minimize our own personal carbon footprints. It’s a reality show. (I feel pretty certain NO ONE has thought of this yet!). Here is the premise: the contest consists of 10 people who are competing for the top spot as the person who lives the “greenest” life. This will be reflected in the contestant’s home, his business, and his own personal living style. The winner of this challenging, prestigious, contest would receive what??…. a recording contract!!!!!
Is anyone else blushing for her? Poor thing. In Hollywood, narcissism is a terrible thing to waste.
OTHERS BLOGGING:
Don Surber Michelle Malkin Sister Toldjah Hot Air
Trackback URL:
http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/trackback/1022575
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (50)
My gosh! I think that girl has a screw loose somewhere in that unrefined brain of hers.
Ewww!!! About the conserving toilet paper! If she wants to use one square, by all means do it! I just hope she washes her hands thoroughly! Yeck!
Her heart is in the right place, but God knows where her brain is.
I recommend a recycling of "Little House on the Prairie" with points given for every application of imitation of lifestyle.
Honestly. Just turn back the clock 100 years. Read the "Foxfire" series. "Green Acres".
Or maybe just turn off the electrical power for a week - ok...make that a day...bet folks would even have a hard time with one day.
Personally, I lived in an all-electric house for about 3 years. Never again. We lost power every year at least once, for anywhere from a couple of hours to 2-3 days. After the first year, we bought a wood stove. We had an RV camper, which was handy for cooking. I could probably have learned to cook on the wood stove, but didn't have sufficient motivation with the camper right outside the back door. Other than that, lots of warm covers for the beds made it just fine. The biggest problem was the septic field. We had an uphill septic field - never will have one of those again, either. Electric power...no problem...toilets flushed into a holding tank which then (electrically) pumped the effluent up the hill to be released and dispersed down the septic field. No power, no pump. No pump, very full holding tank which then caused toilets to back up. _Not_ good.
Thomas Crapper(who invented the flush toilet) is, imo, one of the great men in history. My son - who was in Afghanistan - has formed the opinion that the level of civilization of a country can be measured by the availability of public toilets with available toilet paper. Corn cobs are _not_ an acceptable substitute, and they don't publish Sears catalogs anymore.
Don't mess with my toilet paper supply!!!
Okay, howabout some one upsmanship here? howabout using your finger (that IS what you'd be using with one square o paper), then washing your hand, BUT DON'T USE TOO MUCH WATER! and that soap is SOOO BAD for the environment.....
that girls just eat up with the dumbass.
Why don't more Lefties advocate limits on population growth? Every single environmental problem the Left screams about can be directly attributed to constantly growing populations; more water, more food, more acreage of land, more trees, more fossil fuels, et al, you name it and the more people we have the more of it we use. So again, why doesn't the Left combat population growth? I discussed this some time ago on my blog; the major source of population growth in the US, and world, is from immigrants, illegal and legal and they come mostly from the 3rd or developing world. So to call for population control would be deemed "racist" or "elitist". And the Left can't reconcile protecting the environment with the possibility of being called racist so they berate us all over our consumption instead. That seems to be the easy way out. Typical of the Left.
So this is where the 27% have gone. Hey Amy you don't look that old sign up for the army.
Eric, you're right that the greatest source of population growth is outside the industrialized world, BUT the real issue is how a population consumes and pollutes the environment, and in that arena, the industrialized world outstrips the rest of the world--hands down! The U.S., in particular, consumes far more resources per capita than any other country. Simple facts having nothing to do with Lefties (or Righties).
Two quotes from (believe it or not) Alice Cooper on this subject:
[Regarding rock artists involved in the 2004 "Vote For Change" tour] "When I was a kid and my parents started talking about politics, I'd run to my room and put on the Rolling Stones as loud as I could. So when I see all these rock stars up there talking politics, it makes me sick. If you're listening to a rock star in order to get your information on who to vote for, you're a bigger moron than they are. Why are we rock stars? Because we're morons. We sleep all day, we play music at night and very rarely do we sit around reading the Washington Journal."
"To me that's treason. I call it treason against rock n' roll because rock is the antithesis of politics. Rock should never be in bed with politics." - criticizing the rock artists involved in the anti-Bush "Vote For Change" tour.
In my mind, that speaks VOLUMES.
What great comments! This is such a ridiculous personification of the environmentalist movement. Stop global warming by using less TP? You'll also cut back on overpopulation because who's gonna be getting close?
Mark, that's the other thing... wouldn't you have to use more water if you use less TP? How does that help global warming? For that matter, how does using less TP?
up yours, my husband serves and who'd care for the kids if I joined? I fight the war from my keyboard, and GEN Petraeus addresses the IO (Information Operation) in his counterinsurgency manual. I posted a link on my sidebar. Read it.
Some people are so bitter! Maybe up yours isn't using enough TP.
Oh, and you guys have got to check out this from Hot Air about the Sheryl Crow thing. The picture of Rosie is gross!
I'm with Hawk on this one. Couldn't have said it better myself.
Heh. 1) Over the weekend we watched Mythbusters fold a _MONSTER_ big paper square (they used a hangar to lay it out - 3 football fields long) 10 times to disprove the "myth" that you can't fold a piece of paper more than 7 times. Ok..it was rectangular, not square. I'm ok with one square as long as the size is big enough.
2)Do you suppose we could sponsor some arabs and get toilet paper credits? I mean ... they don't use the stuff and all.... If I "buy" two arabs, I get to use twice as much TP as someone who only "buys" one arab?
Also...
The libs are already out in favor of population control. They call it abortion.
suek, agreed about abortion/population control.
When my kids were smaller, there was a cartoon produced by Jane Fonda and Ted Turner called "Captain Planet". It was an environmentally wacked out program... one episode dealt with overpopulation. It was unbelievable. The little kid cartoon characters were asking each other, "Why are they so poor and hungry in that country?" Another kid would answer, "Because they believe that having lots of children is a good thing. It's leading to overpopulation and hunger. People need to stop having so many kids and there will be more food."
I kid you not. I was appalled. There was no blogosphere in 1994 that I remember or I would have posted about it then. I was just a young mother with 2 babies at the time.
Lets hope she doesnt bite her fingernails lol.
It really doesn't matter HOW much toilet paper you use when you are full of $h*t,
I find the fact that I agree with Rosie on anything a little disturbing. but I guess she can be right about bathroom issues.
That is less TP than my parents said I could use, and I have refused to ration TP since I became and adult.
One sheet -- in a public restroom since those sheets are onion skin thin, that means using none.
Did anyone read Crow's ridiculous second "IDEA"? 10 contestants; whoever lives the greenest life gets a recording contract? I guess it doesn't matter that they can't sing, right? Will Al Gore win and get a recording contract?
Typical Hollywood.... taking an age old concept and ruining it with modernization. The whole American Idol/Dancing with the Stars phenom is that SINGING and DANCING are traditional American passtimes.... you can't take modern political agendas and incorporate the two and have it make any sense.
Just don't steal her idea!
I thought Leticia said it best (and most compassionately) when she said:
Her heart is in the right place, but God knows where her brain is.
Mark Krauss, No, must conserve water, she will have to lick her finger clean.
lol @ Leticia's comment! I was thinking the same thing!
http://www.apa.org/releases/sarcasm.html
"Participants with prefrontal damage were impaired in comprehending sarcasm, whereas the people in the other two groups had no such problem. Within the prefrontal group, people with damage in the right ventromedial area had the most profound problems in comprehending sarcasm. The ventromedial area is the inferior (rear) part of the prefrontal cortex, and includes the cortex on top of the orbits of both eyes and the inside part of the frontal lobes."
“A lesion in each region in the network can impair sarcasm, because if someone has a problem understanding a social situation, he or she may fail to understand the literal language. Thus this study contributes to our understanding of the relation between language and social cognition.”
No word yet as to whether there is a link between political orientation, ability to identify sarcasm, and lesions on the brain. I'll keep everyone here posted.
Great!!! Not only will we have to suffer the effects of a totally natural cyclical warming trend, but now we're going to have to smell bad as well while we wait for the warming trend to end and the cooling trend to take over? Will we then be mandated to use copious amounts of T.P if the world starts to cool? Everyone get set, 'global warming' is the new buzzword for campaigning candidates evidently- they can just smell the money rolling in- McCain wants to start charging 16 dollars for car usage tolls I beleive it is as well as start implimenting carbon credits- Sensibility has lost out to assininity.
This is funny I knew the conservative movement is going through a rough couple of years after all Ams you guys make up what less then 30% that still back the war in Iraq and what 27% (about to hit Nixon status of 26%) that support the smirking chimp that lied this country in the war but this proves the neo con movement is on the last leg when all you clowns have left to talk about is Sheryl Crow and toilet paper. Cons just expect the reality no one cares about what you people think sure America had fun experimenting with the conservative ideology the whole greed is good and we don't need real allies in the world had it moments but when America saw what kind of government it was getting at the hands of conservatives you know corruption, cronyism, recession and a national debt that's going to take your grandkids to pay off you shouldn't be surprise America told you conservatives get the hell out in the 2006 midterms.
But hey if I was a conservative and the country is rejecting the ideology (Conservatism isn't a real ideology maybe if you're rich than ok) and my party heck Ams I would go that route too you know whining about what other people are doing but here's the bright side well you still have the south I should correct that you still have that racist element of the south working for your party and you should be proud of that. Amy and the right wing loons just accept your 27% status and work on excuses on why Mitt, Rudy the cross dresser or whoever you guys pick lost and the further erosion of the Republican party in 2008. And finally question Pat Tillman didn't support the Iraqi war so is he anti American or did he want the US to lose? Amy according to you he was both anti American and he wanted to see the country lose.
So Amy stick to the minor leagues of right wing commentary and that circle of kool aid drinkers that lap this kind of crap up.
Oh,Mr Anon aol.proxy Johnny C put me in my place! How will I ever go on?
My entries are top heavy with defending the war in Iraq. I can't help it that loons on your side add comic relief to the substantial issues of the day.
And I like your quote of 27% "status" that you pulled from your %#$#, perhaps as Fruedian commentary on the toilet paper topic. No quotes, no stats, no facts, just an lame insult hidden behind anonymity.
Um hmmm. koolaid drinkers..... right wing.....chimp.... get some new material!
This war isn't justified by Pat Tillman and I think it's disgraceful the way you try to hijack a soldier's memory to prove a point you otherwise cannot make.
Hoooray for Johnny- the only person alive who can take an issue- ignore the whole issue, and fire off insult after insult that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic being discussed- wait a minute- I guess most dems do that- Sorry Johnny- I guess you're not so unique and unpredictable after all
Get a sense ofhumor. It was a joke
Grumpy, BS. Was she joking about the stupid reality show idea, too? This is called DAMAGE CONTROL because even other environmentalist wackos see how idiotic her comments were.
I read the blog... I'll check to see if the entry has been altered, but it was NO JOKE when I read it. She was completely serious.
I'm a little unsure if she was joking or not, the remark about her brother suggesting washing the square out for re-use made me think it was, but it's still funny, heck I got a kick out of e-mailing the Ladies and asking them if they were on board with the idea. even so, if this was her best thought to express on her new ecoblog, even if she was joking, how funny is that?
Was she joking about the stupid reality show idea, too?
Yes.
This is called DAMAGE CONTROL because even other environmentalist wackos see how idiotic her comments were.
No.
I read the blog... I'll check to see if the entry has been altered, but it was NO JOKE when I read it. She was completely serious.
No, just not very funny. She tried to be funny, and didn't succeed. Because it wasn't funny, it was easier to misinterpret the article as "serious." The fact that WND deliberately pounced on the blog entry (and piggybacked their "reporting" of it on top of the Rove/Crow dust-up) influenced the opinions of a lot of folks in the conservative blogosphere who never read the actual entry (just the WND snippets).
It's tough to watch any time someone jumps the gun, shoots first and asks questions later. But it's even more difficult when they add a shovel to the equation and keep digging their hole deeper.
Another snippet from the same posting at Sheryl Crow's blog:
Laurie and I have been preparing for the George Washington University show on Earth Day by tweeking the rundown. My request for the June Taylor Dancers was denied
I'm guessing that's a joke as well. But who knows? Could be "serious."
Let's say for the sake of argument you're right, vestibule, and this was just a big joke.
1) Why are liberals not funny?
2) Why did other ULTRA liberals take her fully seriously?
3) How would this raise awareness for global warming?
4) Why do liberals, after getting caught, claim it was just a "snafu" or botched joke?
If she were joking, that's even more reason not to be a liberal.
1) Why are liberals not funny?
Yeah, all of my favorite comedians are right-wing conservatives. Sorry, but there's precious little humor coming from the right side of the aisle.
2) Why did other ULTRA liberals take her fully seriously?
Same reason you did. Some people have trouble seeing the whole story when they look at everything through a tiny lens. Sarcasm (poorly executed or not) is usually one of the first casualties...
3) How would this raise awareness for global warming?
Don't know, don't care, don't see where there's a point to be made from it. I think she's got her own blog, a lot of money, and a whole bunch of people around her who laugh at all of her jokes. She and some of her "friends" were chatting on the tour bus and she got the impression that her material was funny. The "June Taylor Dancers" comment doesn't seem to be about global warming awareness, either, so I'm guessing she thinks that her own blog can be as conversational and wandering as she wants it to be, despite her major issue orientation.
4) Why do liberals, after getting caught, claim it was just a "snafu" or botched joke?
Same reason that conservatives do the same thing. And freemasons. And oddfellows and members of the silly party. And in this case, nobody got "caught" doing anything but making an unfunny joke. In fact, it seems like if anyone got "caught", it's the folks in the blogosphere who immediately rushed in with the premature sniping.
I'm really not clear what would cause someone to get all upset about what Sheryl Crow says, anyway. She's not even that hot anymore.
Sheryl Crow in spat with top Bush aide
WASHINGTON — Put celebrity environmental activists in a room with top Bush administration officials and what do you get?
A likely outcome is that an argument will break out, as it did at the White House Correspondent's Association dinner last Saturday night between Karl Rove, American President George W. Bush's deputy chief of staff, and singer Sheryl Crow and Laurie David, a producer of the Al Gore global warming documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth."
Crow and David, who have been visiting campuses on a Stop Global Warming College Tour, said they had approached Mr Rove to urge him to take "a fresh look" at global warming.
The conversation quickly became heated, the three later said.
As Crow and David said on the Huffington Post website on Sunday, when Mr Rove turned towards his table, Crow touched his arm and "Karl swung around and spat: 'Don't touch me'."
Crow told him: "You can't speak to us like that; you work for us," to which he responded; "No, I work for the American people."
Crow and David wrote that the singer shot back: "We are the American people."
In their web posting, Crow and David described Mr Rove as responding with "anger flaring" and as having "exploded with even more venom" as their argument continued.
"She came over to insult me," Mr Rove said last saturday," and she succeeded."
On Sunday, Crow and David called him "a spoiled child throwing a tantrum."
On Monday, the White House said: "I think Karl Rove just wanted to have some fun on Saturday night. And I think he wasn't the only one," in an apparent reference to the lyrics of Crow's signature hit, "All I Wanna Do (Is Have Some Fun)."
(NYT and Reuters)
Speaking of environmentalism and using only what you need:
Average Power Consumption per month:
Condo in Singapore 739 kWh
3 bedroom house in Santa Clara 504 kWh
Gore household in 2005 16,200 kWh
Gore household in 2006 18,414 kWh
Average Power Consumption per year:
National Average Power Consumption in America: 10,656 kWh
Al Gore's household power consumption for 2006: 221,000 kWh
Here's how moonbats respond to the truth.
More:
Writing in The Atlantic Monthly in 2004, liberal writer Eric Alterman criticized producer Laurie David for her use of private Gulfstream jets. David, he wrote "reviles the owners of SUVs as terrorist enablers, yet gives herself a pass when it comes to chartering one of the most wasteful uses of fossil-based fuels imaginable." New Republic writer Gregg Easterbrook followed up, computing that "one cross-country flight in a Gulfstream is the same, in terms of Persian-Gulf dependence and greenhouse-gas emissions, as if she drove a Hummer for an entire year. (Jake Tapper, <span style="font-style: italic;">ABC News</span>)
Maybe Laurie David should change her activist website title from StopGlobalWarming.org to StopBeingAHypocrite.org?
Bonus round: see if you can spot which house belongs to an environmentalist.
Hey, Laurie David flies jets, so global warming is a lie.
I keep learning so much here...
"Oh,Mr Anon aol.proxy Johnny C put me in my place! How will I ever go on?
My entries are top heavy with defending the war in Iraq. I can't help it that loons on your side add comic relief to the substantial issues of the day.
And I like your quote of 27% "status" that you pulled from your %#$#, perhaps as Fruedian commentary on the toilet paper topic. No quotes, no stats, no facts, just an lame insult hidden behind anonymity.
Um hmmm. koolaid drinkers..... right wing.....chimp.... get some new material!
This war isn't justified by Pat Tillman and I think it's disgraceful the way you try to hijack a soldier's memory to prove a point you otherwise cannot make. "
Amy, I'm here to cheer you right wingers up, see I show you I was looking around on the net and guess what I found another poll saying you Bush bots make up 33% you guys moved up maybe in a month or four you guys can push Bush approval rating up to a smoking hot 34% unfortunately you guys still make less than 30% that still support the meat grinder that is call Iraq sorry couldn't cheer you up on that front.
And Amy I wouldn't throw around no facts or quotes because it's clear that your blog contains mostly RNC talking points and other stuff from other neo con wannabe blogs, but Amy I say this if you're feeling froggy I debate you I use my facts and you use your talking points I mean your facts.
As for Pat Tillman, I'm not the one who tried to use his death as a political tool like a certain person that reside in the White House currently did I am not the one that lied to his parents about the facts of his death your boys did and if you can prove me wrong do so.
As for Johnny C that's the name and the blog is the Motor City Liberal where the site motto is you can't say conservative without the word CON
"Oh,Mr Anon aol.proxy Johnny C put me in my place! How will I ever go on?
My entries are top heavy with defending the war in Iraq. I can't help it that loons on your side add comic relief to the substantial issues of the day.
And I like your quote of 27% "status" that you pulled from your %#$#, perhaps as Fruedian commentary on the toilet paper topic. No quotes, no stats, no facts, just an lame insult hidden behind anonymity.
Um hmmm. koolaid drinkers..... right wing.....chimp.... get some new material!
This war isn't justified by Pat Tillman and I think it's disgraceful the way you try to hijack a soldier's memory to prove a point you otherwise cannot make. "
Amy, I'm here to cheer you right wingers up, see I show you I was looking around on the net and guess what I found another poll saying you Bush bots make up 33% you guys moved up maybe in a month or four you guys can push Bush approval rating up to a smoking hot 34% unfortunately you guys still make less than 30% that still support the meat grinder that is call Iraq sorry couldn't cheer you up on that front.
And Amy I wouldn't throw around no facts or quotes because it's clear that your blog contains mostly RNC talking points and other stuff from other neo con wannabe blogs, but Amy I say this if you're feeling froggy I debate you I use my facts and you use your talking points I mean your facts.
As for Pat Tillman, I'm not the one who tried to use his death as a political tool like a certain person that reside in the White House currently did I am not the one that lied to his parents about the facts of his death your boys did and if you can prove me wrong do so.
As for Johnny C that's the name and the blog is the Motor City Liberal where the site motto is you can't say conservative without the word CON
Hm, up yours and Johnny C are the same person. Trying to hide something?
Yawn, right, that's why "you people" keeping reading blogs like mine.
Sure, Johnny C, you wouldn't "throw around no facts or quotes" because YOU HAVE NONE. I have plenty of citations to back up my point of view.. you have an anonymous mick name. I win!
If Crow's little modest proposal was supposed to have been a joke, she doesn't have the talent to carry the idea of parody. That's not a very difficult form. All it requires is that a few things be blown way out of proportion but delivered with deadpan seriousness.
In a nutshell.
No my friends, she was serious.
The sad part? She's another entertainer that'll be a lot harder to listen to now that I know what a brickhead she is.
No my friends, she was serious.
If you want to bury yourself in ignorance, be my guest. The June Taylor Dancers are on their way to entertain you.
Hey, Laurie David flies jets, so global warming is a lie.
Why am I not surprised that, in the face of logical discourse, the moonbats will resort to obfuscation?
The point of Eric Alterman's (who is a liberal writer, by the way) comment is Laurie David's hypocrisy in her campaign for environmental causes.
Laurie David, producer of "An Inconvenient Truth": jets around in a gas-guzzling Gulfstream jet to promote the environmental activist film, "An Inconvenient Truth."
Al Gore, star of "An Inconvenient Truth": lives in a 20-room mansion and consumes more electricity in one month than the average American household does in one year.
This is like having Adolf Hitler campaigning why the Rwanda genocide is immoral.
Of course, since "hypocrite" is pretty much a synonym for "liberal," I am not surprised to see you frantically laying red herrings.
I notice you have nothing to say about Al Gore's energy-guzzling mansion?
National Average Power Consumption in America: 10,656 kWh
Al Gore's household power consumption for 2006: 221,000 kWh
WTH is Al building in there?
A Death Star?
I keep learning so much here...
Here's a free lesson for you:
New terms: limousine liberal, champagne socialist.
Example: Al Gore in his 20-room mansion; John "I represent the average working man" Edward's $400 haircut.
Edwards, 53, who has made alleviating poverty the central theme of candidacy, has been criticized for building a 28,000-square-foot house for $5.3 million near Chapel Hill, N.C. The complex of several buildings on 102 acres includes an indoor basketball court, an indoor pool and a handball court.
Oh yes, the $800 (2 haircuts) were paid by the Democrat's campaign committee.
Sing along: "I feel pretty... Oh, so pretty!"
Why am I not surprised that, in the face of logical discourse, the moonbats will resort to obfuscation?
Since yet another conservative commenter is apparently unable to recognize sarcasm and hyperbole, I consider this case closed.
Since yet another conservative commenter is apparently unable to recognize sarcasm and hyperbole, I consider this case closed.
In the face of facts, yet another liberal cuts and runs.
Anyone surprised?
Facts and logical reasoning possess the curious effect of making liberals flee.
Anyone noticed this phenomenon?
Liberals' mantra (besides "Kumbaya").
Nice try, Ben. Cheers.
"If you want to bury yourself in ignorance, be my guest."
I think I used up my one square of toilet paper for the month. Any chance I can buy some TP credits from you?
you actually believe there's such a thing? man, are you confused....
I'm now having trouble differentiating sarcastic from sardonic...
Interestingly enough, I was a CNN report on this and a correpsondent was in the streets of Times Square (not exactly a haven for conservatives), and it was explained to them that Sheryl Crow was joking. NOT ONE PERSON BELIEVED IT.
It seems this "joke" is not lost an just conservative republicans, is it? In fact, I saw a red carpet event the other night and the stars were commenting on it... none of them made any illusion to it being a joke, either.
Wonder why? Let me tell you: the left has become so nutty with "9/11 was an inside job", "Rove is evil", "Bush Lied" conspiracy theories that every expects the sort of idiocy Crow write in her blog to be sincere.
Sheesh. "The things you think are precious I can't understand."
Sheryle Crow is an anorexic bimbo who has never used toilet paper in her entire life. She doesn't need toilet paper! Everything she eats comes out the same way it went in. She doesn't shit! She only pukes! Naturally when you purge after eating you won't need toilet paper, She just bows down before the porcelain alter, worshiping the goddesses Ana and Mia, performs her ritual of gagging herself and throwing up, talking to Ralph on the great white telephone! She will eventually die of anorexia. Then the world will be a far better place without that skinny little trailer trash bimbo slut!